Both Christ and Buddha Have Compassion for All Sentient Beings. Go Vegan! By Chapman Chen

Both Christianity and Buddhism are vegetarian/vegan faiths. Jehovah suffers in all suffering creatures; Buddha has great compassion for all as one. Both the Holy Bible and Buddhist sutras emphasize empathy with all sentient beings, including animals, forbid the killing of any of them, and condemn meat-eating. Both Jesus and former incarnations of Buddha died for rescuing animals.

Read more

Which One Offered a Vegan Sacrifice? Cain or Abel? By Chapman Chen,

Summary: According to Genesis 4, God rejected Cain’s pure, bloodless, vegan oblation but accepted Abel’s violent, gory, animal sacrifice. This alleged act on the part of God goes against the essential Christian notion of “God is love”. Moreover, throughout the Bible, God time and again condemns animal sacrifice (e.g. Isaiah 1:12, Isaiah 22:12-14, Isaiah 66:2-3, Jeremiah 6:20, Psalm 50:7-14, Ezekiel 34:1-10, Hosea 6:6, 8:11-13, Micah 6:6-8, Matthew 9:13). And in Hebrews 11:4, Abel righteously presented to God “gifts,” the plural form of which implies that it was various fruits of the ground rather than one kind of gift — the fat portions of the firstborn.

Read more

仲有千千萬萬個家明

以前八卦雜誌黃金年代,一張鬆郁蒙夜照就可以寫一篇「失控、狂摷、谷上腦」等等嘅看圖作文。當年唔明無養份又老作嘅東西,為何咁多人俾錢成行成市,香港人應該捨而後快才對。 有前輩教落,八卦雜誌滿足人性好多需要:偷窺慾、仇富、道德批判,為苦悶嘅日常提供發洩口,是否真確不重要,歪風敗壞更加是重點,娛樂圈敗壞,才顯得小市民克己而優越。後來紙媒衰落、娛樂圈淍零無事可寫,八卦雜誌終於式微。但係八卦雜誌背後嘅需求從未消失,取而代之就係今日嘅家明金水之流(仲有一大堆,懶引戰,從略) 同樣,此等KOL滿足求知慾,佢地係content farm轉載各種新鮮事,亦包括跟港人社會有關嘅消息,政治人物取代藝人成為消費對像,近期拉晒坐監,所以家明先至會轉返去消費193。 同時,KOL為讀者提供簡便黑白對錯指標,我呢個圈是對的,其他人是熱狗、左膠、YC、本土派、五毛 etc,好多唔夠時間跟政治新聞嘅人,最簡單二分法就是「佢藍定黃?」今日世途險惡,唔想endorse錯人,唔想俾錯嘅人賺錢,最短捷嘅方法就係問藍定黃,唔識分就唯有靠KOL。 以前八卦雜誌滿足師奶們批判道德嘅需要,現在係KOL替自己個圈子伸張正義。咁KOL都係得把口,當然唔係同你變革香港啦!自然揀就手安全嘅位去鬧,例如有d人成日笑呢個契弟果個無腦YC,有人成日鬧左膠,有人話xx一句KO建制派家明鬧193「明星唔係咁做」,正正係perform緊呢個服務,只係抽錯火水咁解。以前八卦雜誌都要俾幾十蚊買,現在fb唔駛錢,想juicy些少就科水去Patreon,所以家明不會倒,因為佢係販賣緊符合人性需求嘅產品服務:求知、偷窺、判辨危機及善惡、懲惡彰義。 恐龍從來未絕種,只是變成雀鳥。八卦雜誌沒消亡,只是變成KOL及paywall。又想講香港人無得救?八卦雜誌係香港獨有嗎?諗清楚?

Read more

Does “Dominion” over Animals in Genesis Mean Stewardship or Despotism! Go Vegan! By Chapman Chen, HKBNews

“Dominion” in Genesis 1:28 KJV means not domination or despotism but “stewardship” (Linzey 2016) and “protection” (Halteman 2007), because 1. In Gen. 1:29, humans were given a vegan diet; 2. In Gen. 2:15 NIV, humans were instructed by God to “take care of” the Garden with all the animals in it; 3. God made His covenant with not only humans (Noah and his descendants) but also animals (Gen. 9:8-17); 4. God has compassion for all creatures (Psalm 145: 9). 5. Animals are our folk (Gen. 1:30). 6. Christ always sided with the marginalized (Matthew 25:40 NIV); 7. Jesus died at least partly for animal liberation. (Mark 11:18); 8. Via Jesus’s crucifixion and resurrection, God reconciled himself to all groaning creatures and offered them hope of redemption (Colossians 1:19-20).

Read more

Jesus Asks us to Serve the Animals. Go Vegan! By Chapman Chen

Jesus said he came “not” “to be served, but to serve” (Matthew 20:28 NIV), and he told us to be “servant of all” (Mark 9:35 NIV). No wonder English theologian Revd. Prof. Andrew Linzey (1995) argues that Jesus wants us to be “the servant species”. The recipients of our Christ-like service must include both animals and humans, because 1. God suffers in all suffering creatures; 2. Christ always sided with the marginalized; 3. Jesus died at least partly for animal liberation; 4. What Jesus experienced as an individual on the cross represents “incarnation of God’s ubiquitous presence in the psyches of all creatures victimized by predation, injustice, or despair” (Peters 2018), and via His resurrection, all the groaning creatures are offered hope of redemption.

Read more

黑人:總有人係劇本組

1. 大家出於悲憤,「劇本組」成為出氣對象,我完全理解,但我不會加入指責行列2. 並非我大愛或者無感,而係世上總有一些人永遠係劇本組,「xxxx係自編自導」「xxxx是收了共產黨錢」通常係無法處理現實資訊,腦袋根據固有喜好,編造出一個符合胃口的解釋,這是人之常情,並非「YC就是蠢」。UFO影片被當成氣象汽球、被外星人擄拐被指是自我催眠、2021某國選舉不可能舞弊…以上好似太陰謀論是嗎?2007年「迷你債券邊有可能爆煲?人地雷曼百年老舖數口精過你啦」3. 日後可能仲有其他更匪夷所思嘅突發事件,你覺得係自導自演、係官方劇本…我唔會同你拗,正如我都唔會同人拗上帝係幻想,佛祖係FF,每人有自己嘅信仰同理解現實方法4. 唔該諗多一步,如果係劇本,接下來會發生甚麼事?有人出刀斬人,是否會禁刀?還是加強搜身?戲院都要購票入場,政府唔會無端端做場免費戲你睇,你覺得係戲,咁場戲係為乜?對你有咩影響?如果你無思考到呢一步,xxx是劇本只係純粹是疏懶思考的借口,因為你dismiss完件事就算5. 「X是自導自演」常見於2014年佔領行動,X 可以是任何激烈行為。當年政府、佔領者甚至來自各政黨的勢力,紛紛爭奪對運動的定性話語權,佔領方想證明是和平抗爭 (類似美國70年代 Chicago Seven 嘅和平反戰示威),而政府就想construct一個說法,成件事係暴力衝擊。所以不斷搵衝突缺口6. 當時雙方角力嘅結果,係一旦出現偏離佔領「和平主旋律」嘅激烈行動時,馬上會被定性為「自導自演」,以便將之跟「民間自發」的和平佔領者切割出來,保持運動的和平定性7. 當中除了搞手的理念之外,固然涉及大量政客撈選票撈政治資本的計算,但不講咁遠,反正出黎選嘅都入晒冊8. 經2014年嘅調教之後,唔少黃絲民眾開始養出呢種慣性,去判斷意料之外嘅事件,例如近日獨行刺客,網絡馬上有呢種慣性言論9. 有無鬼?當然有!Chicago Seven入面,左膠頭領突然有個自來熟女朋友,帶佢去買大麻搵汽油彈,上庭先發現全部都係FBI同警方臥底,真正嘅鬼,可以比你更熟書,更大膽,而且涼緊冷氣嘅智者們,係永遠防唔到,佢地會變成任何符合你想像嘅人設,溫和或激進都一樣10. 通常「鬼」嘅存在,係要瓦解一個有組織嘅敵對陣營,獨行嘅「鬼」,到底有咩目的?無論你諗到一個咩嘅答案,請諗多一步,如果唔用「鬼」,政府做唔做得到同樣嘅事?用鬼永遠難過暴力行政,又易出錯。更何況,家陣唔駛選,唔駛怕老蘋,甚至唔驚你美帝制裁,搞場戲為乜先?11. 如果諗唔到一個合理嘅答案,好大機會係:根本唔係鬼。ok,你太喜歡鬼故,細細個睇開《鬼世界》,既然你未有一套完整嘅解釋,就講少句,唔好急於伸個頭出來被人隊,因為話xxx係鬼,其實好傷大家感情,有一大班人認為果d係真正手足嘅行動,你去傷佢地感情,係咪搞分化?佢地蠢一回事,你在佢地眼中,一樣蠢12. 如果你喜歡講「面對現實」,現實就係:行動者唔會係咩專業高手,事後永遠都會有愚眾反射式話呢個鬼果個鬼,媽呀我都係移民走,I’ll do

Read more